Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/12/2003
Walker v. State
Citations
- 818 A.2d 1078
- 373 Md. 360
- 3 A.L.R. 6th 761
- 2003 Md. LEXIS 85
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that prosecutors are held to even higher standards of conduct than other attorneys due to their unique role as both advocate and minister of justice
- finding improper vouching to have occurred where a prosecutor made assertions, based on personal knowledge, that a witness was lying
- finding improper vouching to have occurred where a prosecutor made assertions, based on personal knowledge, that a witness was lying
- finding improper vouching to have occurred where a prosecutor made assertions, based on personal knowledge, that a witness was lying
- \[T]he threshold standards for calling any fact witness are merely that the witness have personal knowledge of the matter attested to and that the matter be relevant to the case at hand.\
- “[T]he threshold standards for calling any fact witness are merely that the witness have personal knowledge of the matter attested to and that the matter be relevant to the case at hand.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Spain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-07· cited 70×
- Pantazes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-08-29· cited 45×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-14· cited 43×
- Donaldson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-26· cited 30×
- Stone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-13· cited 29×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GanslerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-11-12· cited 23×
- Behrel v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-05-07· cited 20×
- Sivells v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-02· cited 15×
- Little v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-08-22· cited 13×
- James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2013-04-30· cited 8×
- Patras v. SyphaxCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-02· cited 5×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-07· cited 2×
- Warren v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-02· cited 2×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- United States v. Hector Francisco MolinaNinth Circuit· 1991-06-10· cited 355×
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 259×
- Klauenberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-25· cited 143×
- Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-09-17· cited 141×
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-22· cited 89×
- Beales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-02-05· cited 81×
- United States v. Larry PetermanTenth Circuit· 1988-06-07· cited 78×
- Nance v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-08-23· cited 78×
- Smallwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-08-06· cited 72×
- State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-03-15· cited 62×
- United States v. Victor Elizondo, Juan Carlos Colin, Valdemar Colin, Alejandro Rodriguez and Fernando RodriguezSeventh Circuit· 1990-12-19· cited 60×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-05-10· cited 55×
- Ebb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-02-14· cited 48×
- Watkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-08· cited 40×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Troy Anthony EDWARDS, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1998-08-07· cited 38×
- United States v. Vinny GilbertNinth Circuit· 1995-06-13· cited 35×
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-07-23· cited 35×
- Poole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-04-21· cited 27×
- Elmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-18· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.