Skip to main content

Bradley v. Hall

Citations

  • 720 N.E.2d 747
  • 1999 Ind. App. LEXIS 2149
  • 1999 WL 1140686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on the plaintiffs intentional infliction of emotional distress claim
  • treating a tortious interference with a business relationship claim as one for tortious interference with a contractual relationship and accordingly not requiring a showing of illegality
  • denying summary judgment where “[r]easonable persons may differ on the questions of whether [defendant’s] conduct was extreme and outrageous and, if so, whether that conduct caused [plaintiff] to suffer severe emotional distress.”
  • reversing grant of summary judgment because “[r]easonable persons may differ on the questions of whether Hall’s conduct was extreme and outrageous and, if so, whether that conduct caused Bradley to suffer severe emotional distress”
  • summary judgment dismissing IIED claim inappropriate when employer asked employee about her menopause and asked if her husband was impotent due to his diabetes
  • summary judgment dismissing 19 IIED claim inappropriate when employer asked employee about her menopause and asked if her husband was impotent due to his diabetes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Staton, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.