Williams v. Seniff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, unless an individual was involved in the decision-making process or provided input into a disciplinary decision, that individual’s expression of discriminatory feelings is not evidence that the decision was discriminatory
• “Although a nonmoving party’s own deposition may constitute affirmative evidence to defeat summary judgment, conclusory statements in the deposition do not create an issue of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).