· 6/26/1975
Price v. Hal Roach Studios, Inc.
Citations
- 400 F. Supp. 836
- 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11698
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- characterizing as “nonsensical” the argument that, through non-use, a person could lose rights in his own name and likeness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.