Alaska Supreme Court· 4/25/2014
Boulds v. Nielsen
Citations
- 323 P.3d 58
- 58 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1292
- 2014 WL 1663393
- 2014 Alas. LEXIS 72
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act to domestic partnership property distribution before applying intent analysis
- explaining the principles that apply to the division of property of an unmarried couple
- affirming equal property distribution because parties intended property to be partnership asset
- “Alaska, like Washington, provides for marital-like property distribution following a cohabitative relationship.” (citing Bishop v. Clark, 54 P.3d 804, 811 (Alaska 2002); Wood v. Collins, 812 P.2d 951, 956 (Alaska 1991))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fabe, Winfree, Stowers, Maassen, Bolger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court· 1979-01-22· cited 837×
- Connell v. FranciscoWashington Supreme Court· 1995-07-20· cited 113×
- Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-11-27· cited 92×
- Beal v. BealOregon Supreme Court· 1978-04-18· cited 76×
- In re PenningtonWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-21· cited 72×
- Clauson v. ClausonAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-05-08· cited 70×
- In Re Marriage of PenningtonWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-21· cited 69×
- Wood v. CollinsAlaska Supreme Court· 1991-06-07· cited 48×
- Jaymot v. Skillings-DonatAlaska Supreme Court· 2009-09-25· cited 41×
- Curran v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court· 2001-08-31· cited 30×
- Bishop v. ClarkAlaska Supreme Court· 2002-09-13· cited 24×
- Madonna v. Tamarack Air, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court· 2013-04-12· cited 22×
- Tolan v. KimballAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-10-19· cited 17×
- Reed v. ParrishAlaska Supreme Court· 2012-10-19· cited 8×
- Owens v. Automotive MacHinists Pension TrustNinth Circuit· 2009-01-12· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.