In Re Marriage of Pennington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the various factors under Connell v. Francisco, 127 Wn.2d 339, 898 P.2d 831 (1995
• considering the various factors under Connell v. Francisco, 127 Wn.2d 339, 898 P.2d 831 (1995), to determine whether and how to equitably distribute parties’ property at the end of a meretricious relationship in order to avoid unjust enrichment
• declining to make an equitable distribution on the basis of cooking, cleaning, and interior decoration, where plaintiff could not show she invested her time or money into one specific asset so as to create an inequity
• declining to make an equitable distribution on the basis of cooking, cleaning, and interior decoration, where plaintiff could not show she invested her time or money into one specific asset so as to create an inequity
• mutual intent to have a committed intimate relationship is one of the Connell factors evidencing such a relationship
• determination of whether facts give rise to a “meretricious relationship” is “a mixed question of law and fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).