Boring v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• link between evidence and appellant’s purported satanic beliefs was “forged only via the State’s opening statement and closing argument, which itself was improper.”
• “[T]he evidence, while far from overwhelming, was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant was guilty of the crimes of which she was convicted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).