Borden v. Sinskey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the mere possibility that factual disputes may exist is not sufficient to satisfy the summary judgment burden
• evaluating plaintiff's legitimate entitlement to continued employment as dispositive of plaintiff's due process claim
• in a review of a summary judgment determination, we must resolve all ambiguities in favor of the party against whom summary judgment is sought
• three-year limit preferred over more specific limit of one year of N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law § 50 — i( 1)
• “[T]here appears to be general agreement that a property interest arises only when an individual possesses ‘a legitimate claim of entitlement’ to continued job tenure.”
• carefully conceived scheme of innuendo meets the dissemination of a false and defamatory impression requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).