Seidel v. Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the doctrine of inherent unknowability inapplicable to the plaintiffs case and barring the plaintiffs state law claims
• explaining shareholders are entitled to rely on good faith of fiduciaries but \should not put on blinders to such obvious signals [of wrongdoing] as publicly filed documents\
• tolling did not apply because the “public documents, which form the basis of many of Plaintiffs claims, could have provided Plaintiff with adequate notice of any alleged misconduct by Defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).