Halpern v. Barran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[i]t is by now firmly established that the three-year statute of limitations” applies to claims of breach of fiduciary duty in Delaware
• explaining that a plaintiff invoking fraudulent concealment must “plead with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud” under Rule 9(b)”
• stating that fraudulent concealment must be plead with sufficient particularity
• “Where there has been fraudulent concealment from a plaintiff, the statute is suspended until his rights are discovered or until they could have been discovered by the exercise of reasonable diligence.”
• “Where there has been fraudulent concealment from a plaintiff, the statute is suspended only until his rights are discovered or until they could have been discovered by the exercise of reasonable diligence.”
• “Where there has been fraudulent concealment from a plaintiff, the statute is suspended only until his rights are discovered or until they could have been discovered by the exercise of reasonable diligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).