Simone H. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in psychotherapist-patient privilege context, as governed by CINA Rule 9(b)(3
• applying CINA Rule 9(b)(3) and affirming trial court's determination that disclosure of confidential communications 'between child and her psychotherapist would have been an unnecessary invasion of child's privacy
• “When applying a multi-factor test, ‘[t]he superior court abuses its discretion if it considers improper factors . . . , fails to consider statutorily mandated factors, or assigns disproportionate weight to some factors while ignoring others.’ ” (alterations in original
• applying same standard to child custody factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).