Fifth Circuit· 9/13/1993
Booker v. Koonce
Citations
- 2 F.3d 114
- 1993 WL 328118
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “[a] claim against a defendant who is immune from suit is frivolous because it is based upon an indisputably meritless legal theory”
- emphasizing that the claim must truly lack merit, such as where the defendant has immunity to suit
- applying Section 1915 to non-prisoner, former arrestee who claimed wrongful arrest and affirming dismissal under Section 1915
- noting dismissal of claims with “some chance” of success is inappropriate at screening stage but affirming dismissal where pro se plaintiff’s claim “[was] based upon an indisputably meritless legal theory”
- noting dismissal of claims with \some chance\ of success is inappropriate at screening stage but affirming dismissal where pro se plaintiff's claim \[was] based upon an indisputably meritless legal theory\
- noting dismissal of claims with \some chance\ of success is inappropriate at screening stage but affirming dismissal where pro se plaintiff's claim \[was] based upon an indisputably meritless legal theory\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Politz, Garza, Jolly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Christopher J. Murphy v. J.A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionFifth Circuit· 1994-08-02· cited 176×
- Mackey v. DicksonFifth Circuit· 1995-03-16· cited 144×
- Cleveland Hicks, Jr. v. Jack M. Garner, Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1995-11-03· cited 141×
- Eason v. HoltFifth Circuit· 1996-01-26· cited 112×
- Littles v. Board of Pardons & Paroles DivisionFifth Circuit· 1995-11-02· cited 82×
- Trent Taylor v. Marion WilliamsFifth Circuit· 2019-12-20· cited 43×
- Brinson v. McKeemanW.D. Texas· 1997-12-31· cited 38×
- Frazier v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationE.D. Louisiana· 1995-10-20· cited 1×
- Burrell v. GriffithE.D. Texas· 1994-10-26· cited 1×
- Murphy v. CollinsFifth Circuit· 1994-07-08
- Hicks v. GarnerFifth Circuit· 1995-11-03
- Casiano v. United StatesS.D. Texas· 1997-01-30
- Tate v. GusmanE.D. Louisiana· 2006-11-07
- in Re Reidie James Jackson, RelatorTexas Supreme Court· 2015-11-25
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 22,300×
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court· 1992-05-04· cited 9,936×
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court· 1976-03-02· cited 7,274×
- Norman R. Spears v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1985-07-03· cited 837×
- Thomas James Hand v. Stuart Gary, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Deputy SheriffFifth Circuit· 1988-03-10· cited 174×
- Gary Terrell v. University of Texas System PoliceFifth Circuit· 1986-06-30· cited 172×
- Anderson v. State Bar of CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1991-01-22· cited 154×
- Mary Turner, A/K/A Mary Turner Hind, a Feme Sole v. Upton County, TexasFifth Circuit· 1990-09-11· cited 125×
- David Darrell Moore v. Ray MabusFifth Circuit· 1992-11-02· cited 117×
- Kevin Michael Cay v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1986-05-12· cited 102×
- Jerry Lynn Young v. Neil B. Biggers, Jr., J.W. CollinsFifth Circuit· 1991-07-26· cited 84×
- Dr. Alvin I. Thomas, Cross-Appellant v. Eristus Sams, Individually and as Mayor of Prairie View, and City of Prairie View, Defendant-Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1984-09-17· cited 75×
- Wallace S. Pugh v. Parish of St. TammanyFifth Circuit· 1989-06-20· cited 63×
- Paul Ross Wooton v. Pumpkin Air, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1989-04-10· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.