Skip to main content
· 11/2/1992

David Darrell Moore v. Ray Mabus

Citations

  • 976 F.2d 268
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28262
  • 1992 WL 289392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ordering the district court to appoint counsel to assist the plaintiff, state, and federal court in resolving “important unanswered questions.”
  • reversing § 1915(d) dismissal based on \potentially erroneous legal conclusions\ (citing Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 328-30, 109 S. Ct. at 1833-34)
  • explaining the distinction between factual and legal frivolousness in in forma pauperis complaints

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, King, Garwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.