Mackey v. Dickson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court “may—indeed should—stay proceedings in the section 1983 case until the pending criminal case has run its course, as until that time it may be difficult to determine the relation, if any, between the two”
• opining that courts should stay proceedings “until the pending criminal case 5 See also Queen v. Purser, 109 Fed. App’x. 659 (5th Cir. 2004
• opining that courts should stay proceedings “until the pending criminal case has run its course . . . .”
• opining that courts should stay proceedings “until the pending criminal case has run its course . . . .”
• opining that courts should stay proceedings “until the pending criminal case has run its course . . . .”
• opining that courts should stay proceedings “until the pending criminal case has run its course . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).