Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 6/26/1917

Bluefields S. S. Co. v. United Fruit Co.

Citations

  • 243 F. 1
  • 155 C.C.A. 531
  • 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2082

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • including the Song-Beverly Act’s civil 21 penalty of up to two times the amount of actual damages for the purposes of 22 calculating amount in controversy under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
  • considering a policy that defined “occurrence” as an 20 accident and stating that a layperson “would have no reason to think that an act of self- 21 defense was necessarily excluded” from the meaning of “occurrence”
  • “[t]he Rehabilitation Act, like the ADA, 16 proscribes discrimination against a qualified individual with a disability because of the 17 disability . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woolley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.