· 12/13/1880
Daniels v. Tearney
Citations
- 102 U.S. 415
- 26 L. Ed. 187
- 1880 U.S. LEXIS 2049
- 12 Otto 415
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \That the ordinance of secession was void is a proposition we need not discuss. The affirmative has been settled by the arbitrament of arms and the repeated adjudications of this court.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Swayne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.