Skip to main content
· 12/13/1880

Daniels v. Tearney

Citations

  • 102 U.S. 415
  • 26 L. Ed. 187
  • 1880 U.S. LEXIS 2049
  • 12 Otto 415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \That the ordinance of secession was void is a proposition we need not discuss. The affirmative has been settled by the arbitrament of arms and the repeated adjudications of this court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swayne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.