Skip to main content

Sullivan v. State

Citations

  • 16 Fla. 564

Syllabus

<p>1. The record showing that the defendants were brought into court, that they appeared by counsel, plead to the indictment, were tried and convicted, is sufficient evidence of a propel' arraignment.</p> <p>2. When the bill of exceptions does not bring up all the evidence taken upon the trial of the cause, the court will infer that there was sufficient introduced to warrant the finding of the jury.</p> <p>3. Exceptions to the charge of the court must be taken at the time the instructions t© the jury so complained of are given, and the evidence of that fact must appear in the bill of exceptions.</p> <p>4. To enable a party to avail himself of the error in the court refusing to instruct the jury as requested, the attention of the court must be called to the particular points upon which such instruction is asked and that before the jury shall have retired to consider of their verdict.</p>

Judges: Yalkenbubgh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.