Skip to main content

Blaylock v. State

Citations

  • 537 So. 2d 1103
  • 1988 WL 138549

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reflecting that nondisclosure is considered material if it is substantial and important so that if the facts has been known, the complaining party might have been influenced to peremptorily exclude the juror from the jury
  • wherein a juror disclosed the fact that he had been held hostage, but defendant's trial counsel made a tactical decision to intentionally refrain from pursuing the line of questioning concerning that subject
  • response on voir dire is only material \if it is so substantial and important that if the facts were known [the moving party] may have been influenced to peremptorily exclude the [juror] from the jury.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Baskin and Ferguson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.