Birch Ex Rel. Birch v. Albert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• clarifying that \an automatic new trial [is not mandated] whenever there has been a nondisclosure of litigation information\
• underscoring that information is considered to be concealed if it is “squarely asked for” and not provided
• holding that information is considered concealed for purposes of the three-part test when the information is squarely asked for and not provided; but it is not concealment when the juror's answer is ambiguous and counsel fails to follow up with further questioning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).