United States v. James R. Monaco and Eugene O. Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that although the testimony of a witness who violates the rule of sequestration is not necessarily inadmissible, \whether such a witness is to be permitted to testify is generally left to the sound discretion of the trial court\
• vacating district court order enforcing back pay award to employee not mentioned in submission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).