Tenth Circuit· 12/6/2004
Bitler v. A.O. Smith Corp.
Citations
- 391 F.3d 1114
- 65 Fed. R. Serv. 1223
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25019
- 2004 WL 2786463
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding “scientifically valid” methodology when fire investigator used his personal experience, training, method of observation, and deductive reasoning to reach opinion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hartz, Lucero, McKay
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Norris v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Tenth Circuit· 2005-02-08· cited 195×
- Student Marketing Group, Inc. v. College Partnership, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2007-08-09· cited 179×
- Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc.First Circuit· 2011-03-22· cited 130×
- Henning v. Union Pacific RailroadTenth Circuit· 2008-06-19· cited 122×
- Feliciano-Hill v. Veterans AffairsFirst Circuit· 2006-02-22· cited 120×
- Champagne Metals v. Ken-Mac Metals, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2006-08-07· cited 104×
- Granfield v. CSX Transportation, Inc.First Circuit· 2010-03-11· cited 74×
- United States v. MonteiroD. Massachusetts· 2006-01-06· cited 72×
- Bowers v. Norfolk Southern Corp.M.D. Georgia· 2007-07-26· cited 50×
- Russo v. Ballard Medical ProductsTenth Circuit· 2008-12-18· cited 39×
- SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonN.D. Oklahoma· 2017-04-25· cited 26×
- San Francisco v. Wendy's International, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court· 2007-12-19· cited 25×
- In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationM.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-12-07· cited 24×
- United States v. AllenTenth Circuit· 2010-05-07· cited 22×
- Morales v. E.D. Etnyre & Co.D. New Mexico· 2005-06-17· cited 21×
- Bryant v. BGHA, Inc.M.D. Georgia· 2014-03-27· cited 14×
- Harjo v. City of AlbuquerqueD. New Mexico· 2018-07-28· cited 14×
- Leprino Foods Co. v. Factory Mutual InsuranceTenth Circuit· 2011-07-27· cited 13×
- Moody v. Ford Motor Co.N.D. Oklahoma· 2007-03-20· cited 13×
- United States v. GanadonegroD. New Mexico· 2011-08-10· cited 12×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court· 1999-03-23· cited 8,651×
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court· 1997-12-15· cited 4,535×
- Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABFourth Circuit· 1999-05-20· cited 585×
- Raymond Rosen v. Ciba-Geigy CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1996-03-11· cited 231×
- Mitchell v. Gencorp Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1999-01-07· cited 216×
- Medlock v. Ortho Biotech, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1999-01-05· cited 199×
- Zuchowicz v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1998-03-20· cited 150×
- Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand, Co.Tenth Circuit· 2000-06-07· cited 139×
- Gardetto v. MasonTenth Circuit· 1996-11-13· cited 127×
- Goebel v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadTenth Circuit· 2003-10-09· cited 126×
- Stephen Brent WHEELER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN DEERE COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-AppellantTenth Circuit· 1988-12-02· cited 107×
- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado v. SharpSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-07-27· cited 105×
- United States v. VelardeTenth Circuit· 2000-06-02· cited 91×
- Black v. M & W Gear CompanyTenth Circuit· 2001-11-07· cited 73×
- Robert E. ORTH and Connie A. Orth, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY, WHITE-RODGERS DIVISION, Defendant-AppellantTenth Circuit· 1992-11-24· cited 54×
- Bobby M. Ponder v. Warren Tool Corporation and Patch Rubber CompanyTenth Circuit· 1987-12-10· cited 47×
- Hynes v. Energy West, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2000-05-02· cited 40×
- Williams v. Continental Airlines, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1996-09-05· cited 33×
- Richard L. Hudson v. H. A. Smith, Eugene P. Mitchell, Swan Engineering and Supply, Inc., and Sealco, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1980-04-09· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.