Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado v. Sharp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “summary judgment is a drastic remedy, and is not a substitute for a trial of disputed facts”
• finding sufficient evidence of but-for causation and affirming court of appeals without reaching its \`substantial factor' analysis\
• finding sufficient evidence of but-for causation and affirming court of appeals without reaching its “ ‘substantial factor’ analysis”
• declining to address several issues because “the resolution of those issues is not necessary to this appeal”
• declining to address several issues because \the resolution of those issues is not necessary to this appeal\
• “The existence of a causative link between the plaintiff's injuries and the defendant's negligence is a question of fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).