Skip to main content

Rodriguez v. State

Citations

  • 844 S.W.2d 744
  • 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 211
  • 1992 WL 341975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, where no witnesses were called and no evidence was presented at a hearing on a motion to suppress, the trial court was permitted to determine the merits of the motion on the motion itself
  • indicating that courts of appeals should consider written motions to suppress and attachments to such motions in reviewing trial courts’ rulings on the motions
  • holding docket sheets are not evidence upon which the parties may rely on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.