Sixth Circuit· 2/1/2011

Bishop v. Hackel

Citations

636 F.3d 757
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 1989
2011 WL 291951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the district court erred by failing to evaluate the liability of each defendant individually
finding that a plaintiff “suffering from severe mental illness” was objectively at risk when housed with a “predatory” cellmate
holding that plaintiffs failed to make out a triable issue of fact as to whether an officer exhibited deliberate indifference in part because the officer who had worked in the jail health unit did not ‘hear any complaints or conversations or arguments’”
stating that the plaintiff must establish “knowledge of a risk to his safety because of his status as a vulnerable inmate and [the assaulter’s] status as a predatory inmate”
analyzing whether there was an objectively substantial risk of harm to the inmate before (4:24CV2141) the injury occurred without regard to the injury incurred
analyzing whether there was an objectively substantial risk of harm to the inmate before the injury occurred without regard to the injury incurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Gibbons, Kethledge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.