Angelo DiLuzio v. Village of Yorkville Ohio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in qualified immunity cases, we usually “defer to the district court’s factual determinations” and “ideally . . . look no further than the district court’s opinion for the facts and inferences cited expressly therein”
• stating that we lack jurisdiction to consider “fact-based (‘evidence sufficiency’) appeals [that] challenge directly the plaintiff’s allegations (and the district court’s acceptance
• explaining that whether a defendant’s actions amount to a constitutional violation is a legal question we may review on interlocutory appeal
• noting that \the Sixth Circuit has never held that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine applies to municipal government officials in a § 1983 action and the district courts within our circuit are split on this question\
• discussing how it was appropriate to consider facts that are not stated in the district court’s record, but that may bolster the court’s determination
• discussing how it was appropriate to consider facts that are not stated in the district court’s record, but that may bolster the court's determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).