Skip to main content
· 8/8/2012

Charles Austin v. Redford Township Police Depart

Citations

  • 690 F.3d 490
  • 2012 WL 3194227
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jury could find taser shock unreasonable under Fourth Amendment where suspect \disoriented\ from prior taser deployment was given only 30 seconds to comply with officer's order
  • “[A]n appellate court may overrule a district court’s determination that a factual dispute exists where evidence in the record establishes that the determination is blatantly and demonstrably false.” (quotation omitted)
  • “In exceptional circumstances, an appellate court may overrule a district court’s determination that a factual dispute exists where evidence in the record establishes that the determination is blatantly and demonstrably false.”
  • discussing use of a taser

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Stranch, Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.