Birrane v. Master Collectors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “no basis whatsoever for holding that merely because a corporation transacts business in the state . . . or has other substantial contacts with the state, an individual who is its principal should be deemed to have engaged in those activities personally”
• absent grounds warranting the court piercing the corporate veil, there is no basis whatsoever for exercising personal jurisdiction over corporate officer whose only contacts are via corporate activities in state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).