Vogel v. Sylvester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “unless particular acts of misconduct are indicative of a lack of veracity, it is error to permit cross-examination concerning them, however much they may be indicative of bad moral character”
• wherein the court upheld an award of $60,000 for criminal conversation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).