Utah Supreme Court· 8/12/1993
Birch Creek Irrigation v. Prothero
Citations
- 858 P.2d 990
- 219 Utah Adv. Rep. 11
- 1993 Utah LEXIS 112
- 1993 WL 314998
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court erred in granting permanent injunction on motion for preliminary injunction, regardless of whether permanent injunction would have been appropriate upon proper motion
- trial court erred in granting permanent injunction on motion for preliminary injunction, regardless of whether permanent injunction would have been appropriate upon proper motion
- \[Since defendants] are not attacking the sufficiency of the evidence ... [but rather] arguing that the trial court did not comply with the requirements of the applicable rules as a matter of law .... [they are] not required to marshal the evidence. ...\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham, Hall, Howe, Stewart, Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mitchell Carlton Sims v. Jill Brown, WardenNinth Circuit· 2005-09-21· cited 57×
- ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C.Utah Supreme Court· 2010-11-19· cited 49×
- Envirotech Corp. v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-04-01· cited 21×
- Strawberry Electric Service District v. Spanish Fork CityUtah Supreme Court· 1996-06-21· cited 19×
- Searle v. SearleCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2001-12-06· cited 12×
- Miller v. Martineau Co., C.P.A.Court of Appeals of Utah· 1999-07-01· cited 11×
- Hi-Country Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Foothills Water Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1996-10-29· cited 11×
- Jenkins v. WeisCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-01-07· cited 10×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court· 1932-05-16· cited 528×
- Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 387×
- Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court· 1932-12-12· cited 368×
- Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court· 1926-04-12· cited 173×
- Chappell & Co., Inc., T. B. Harms Company, Williamson Music, Inc., Frank Loesser and Frank Music Corp. v. J. Jay FrankelSecond Circuit· 1966-10-13· cited 92×
- System Concepts, Inc. v. DixonUtah Supreme Court· 1983-08-08· cited 43×
- Doelle v. BradleyUtah Supreme Court· 1989-12-27· cited 43×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.