· 5/16/1932
Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma
Citations
- 286 U.S. 210
- 52 S. Ct. 559
- 76 L. Ed. 1062
- 1932 U.S. LEXIS 797
- 86 A.L.R. 403
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that statute might not be vague if terms used were familiar to those with knowledge of the subject regulated
- severability clause “discloses an intention to make [a statute] divisible and creates a presumption that, eliminating invalid parts, the legislature would have been satisfied with what remained”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Butler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.