Skip to main content
· 5/16/1932

Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma

Citations

  • 286 U.S. 210
  • 52 S. Ct. 559
  • 76 L. Ed. 1062
  • 1932 U.S. LEXIS 797
  • 86 A.L.R. 403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that statute might not be vague if terms used were familiar to those with knowledge of the subject regulated
  • severability clause “discloses an intention to make [a statute] divisible and creates a presumption that, eliminating invalid parts, the legislature would have been satisfied with what remained”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Butler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.