Court of Appeals of Utah· 12/6/2001
Searle v. Searle
Citations
- 2001 UT App 367
- 38 P.3d 307
- 436 Utah Adv. Rep. 10
- 2001 Utah App. LEXIS 98
- 2001 WL 1554023
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that whether someone assumes obligations in loco parentis “depends on whether that person intends to assume that obligation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jackson, Bench, Billings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ShermanTennessee Supreme Court· 2008-08-15· cited 193×
- Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2011-09-09· cited 20×
- Weiser v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court· 2010-02-05· cited 16×
- Merrill v. AltmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-12-28· cited 5×
- Duffin v. DuffinCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2024-10-31· cited 1×
- State of Tennessee v. Danita Lanette Wilson and Tiffany Nicole NormanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2011-12-19
- Sunrise Home Health and Hospice v. NyeCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2025-05-01
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 1,403×
- Moore v. SimsSupreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 1,323×
- Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 789×
- Miller v. City of PhiladelphiaThird Circuit· 1999-04-26· cited 242×
- Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-01-19· cited 138×
- Matter of Adoption of HallowayUtah Supreme Court· 1986-12-05· cited 114×
- Sims v. STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC WELFARE, ETC.S.D. Texas· 1977-10-12· cited 58×
- Gillmor v. WrightUtah Supreme Court· 1993-03-22· cited 54×
- Gribble v. GribbleUtah Supreme Court· 1978-07-21· cited 51×
- Badger v. Brooklyn Canal CompanyUtah Supreme Court· 1998-07-07· cited 46×
- Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc. v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2000-04-20· cited 44×
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. TremblaySupreme Court· 1912-02-19· cited 40×
- State in Interest of JWFUtah Supreme Court· 1990-10-19· cited 40×
- Pan Energy v. MartinUtah Supreme Court· 1991-05-24· cited 39×
- Lund v. BrownUtah Supreme Court· 2000-09-22· cited 36×
- In Re Adoption of SSIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-10-19· cited 32×
- State in Interest of HjCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1999-08-05· cited 30×
- State in Interest of K.M.Court of Appeals of Utah· 1998-09-03· cited 28×
- Holm v. SmilowitzCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-09-25· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.