Mississippi Supreme Court· 2/16/1995
Billiot v. State
Citations
- 655 So. 2d 1
- 1995 WL 62112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that to be competent under Ford, a prisoner must \have a rational understanding of what it means to be exe- cuted\
- rejecting argument that death row inmate suffering from paranoid schizophrenia is not competent to be executed
- rejecting argument that death row inmate suffering from paranoid schizophrenia is not competent to be executed
- Because “this case was remanded for the limited reason of determining present insanity,” the Court barred the issue regarding the constitutionality of the statute addressing insane, condemned prisoners
- rejecting reliance on a three-vote plurality
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Sullivan and Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Berry v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-11-20· cited 258×
- Goff v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2009-05-28· cited 189×
- Burrough v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2009-04-02· cited 128×
- Van Tran v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1999-11-23· cited 76×
- Conner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 68×
- Percy Levar Walton v. Gene M. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of CorrectionsFourth Circuit· 2006-03-09· cited 65×
- Coe v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 2000-03-06· cited 62×
- Billiot v. PuckettFifth Circuit· 1998-02-12· cited 32×
- Rochell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1999-09-23· cited 28×
- Neal v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 25×
- Marlon Latodd Howell v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2014-10-09· cited 21×
- Greenwood Utilities v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2001-12-11· cited 14×
- Provenzano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-25· cited 10×
- Madden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2010-06-29· cited 9×
- Chapell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2012-06-19· cited 8×
- Burns v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 7×
- Nance v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2000-09-05· cited 7×
- Billiot v. EppsS.D. Mississippi· 2009-11-03· cited 6×
- Higginbotham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2013-02-26· cited 6×
- Battaglia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2017-09-20· cited 5×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
- Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,525×
- Neal v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-05-23· cited 666×
- Hansen v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-12-18· cited 521×
- Billiot v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-06-06· cited 479×
- Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 461×
- Fisher v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-10-16· cited 457×
- Cole v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-07-29· cited 352×
- Balfour v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-03-25· cited 344×
- Irving v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1978-08-02· cited 331×
- Hill v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1983-05-04· cited 307×
- Culberson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1979-11-28· cited 284×
- Russell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-08-12· cited 253×
- Harrison v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-04-14· cited 247×
- Chamblee v. ChambleeMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-06-02· cited 209×
- Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1991-08-15· cited 146×
- Irving v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 132×
- Rice Researchers, Inc. v. HiterMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-09-02· cited 118×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.