Skip to main content

Van Tran v. State

Citations

  • 6 S.W.3d 257
  • 1999 Tenn. LEXIS 602

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that post-conviction is not the appropriate avenue for litigating the issue of competency to be executed
  • holding that post-conviction is not the appropriate avenue for litigating the issue of competency to be executed
  • holding that the required threshold showing to establish a genuine disputed issue regarding a prisoner’s competency to be executed may be met by submitting affidavits, depositions, medical reports, or other credible evidence
  • holding that unsupported assertions of incompetency to be executed are not sufficient to meet the required threshold showing
  • holding that unsupported assertions of incompetency to be executed are not sufficient to meet the required threshold showing
  • holding that unsupported assertions of incompetency to be executed are not sufficient to meet the required threshold showing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Drowota, Anderson, Holder, Barker, Birch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.