Bill E. Davis v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dismissal without prejudice is proper when the district court dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
• holding that district court incorrectly dismissed case with prejudice because it did not reach the merits of the case
• holding that it was incorrect for the district court to dismiss case with prejudice without reaching the merits of the case
• holding that district court incorrectly dismissed case with prejudice because it did not reach the merits of the case
• holding that claim for breach of fiduciary duty did not fall within FTCA where claim was “predicated upon the breach of a condition in the promissory note”
• noting that while a court should freely give leave when justice so requires, leave to amend “is by no means automatic”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).