Skip to main content
· 3/14/1985

39 Fair empl.prac.cas. 162, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,583 Eligio Castro and Rafael Diaz Diaz v. United States of America

Citations

  • 775 F.2d 399
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30402
  • 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,583
  • 39 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a prevailing party “ordinarily is entitled” to recoup the costs enumerated in section 1920
  • upholding injunction against further filings against employer for nonrenewal because multiple actions filed were intended only to harass, contained virtually identical allegations, and were personally insulting to defendant and its counsel
  • barring further pleadings in case or further litigation with regard to specific subject matter
  • abrogated on other grounds by Stevens v. Dep’t of the Treasury, 500 U.S. 1, 111 S.Ct. 1562, 114 L.Ed.2d 1 (1991)
  • to claim a property interest in a benefit, a person must have more than a unilateral expectation of i t ; he must have a legitimate claim of entitlement to it
  • to claim a property interest in a benefit, a person must have more than a unilateral expectation of i t ; he must have a legitimate claim of entitlement to it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Coffin, Breyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.