Skip to main content
· 7/28/2004

Bildstein v. Mastercard International Inc.

Citations

  • 329 F. Supp. 2d 410
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14313
  • 2004 WL 1682822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting motion to dismiss because the plaintiff “failed to allege that the claimed deception caused him to pay more in making his foreign currency purchases than he otherwise would have paid”
  • finding no injury where plaintiff did not allege that defendant “failed to deliver the service [plaintiff] paid for” by using credit card abroad, but only that its use incurred an undisclosed transaction fee
  • “The Amended Complaint is bereft of any allegation that MasterCard failed to deliver the service Bildstein paid for[.]”
  • “A material claim is one that involves information that is important to consumers and, hence, likely to affect their choice of, or conduct regarding, a product.”
  • “[A] plaintiff must allege that the defendant has engaged in an act or practice that is deceptive or misleading in a material way and that plaintiff has been injured by reason thereof.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pauley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.