In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that arbitration clauses signed by putative class members after litigation was commenced could not be enforced
• holding that putative class members who had “forfeit[ed] their rights as potential plaintiffs” by signing arbitration agreements were protected as of the filing date of the case
• holding that \serious disputes about material facts... require an evidentiary hearing\
• finding that communications were potentially coercive where class members were reliant on the defendants for their future credit needs as well as information about the litigation
• explaining that “putative class members' rights” are “protected as of the filing date of the complaint” in a class action.
• holding a mid-litigation arbitration agreement was unconscionable because it tethered plaintiff’s only source for credit needs upon withdrawing from class action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).