D. New Jersey· 8/15/2016
Argabright v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.
Citations
- 201 F. Supp. 3d 578
- 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108478
- 2016 WL 4402819
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that because the plaintiffs stated a viable breach of implied warranty claim, their MMWA claim could proceed
- “Having failed to state a viable state law claim for breach of express warranty, Plaintiffs’ derivative MMWA claim must also be dismissed.”
- permitting plaintiffs’ MMWA claim to proceed where plaintiffs had stated a viable state law breach of warranty claim
- permitting plaintiffs’ MMWA claim to proceed where plaintiffs had stated a viable state law breach of warranty claim
- agreeing with the many cases discussed here in holding that plaintiffs failed to state a claim for substantive unconscionability despite pleading defendants knew of the defect at the time of sale and manipulated its warranty
- “False promises, misrepresentations, and concealment or omission of material facts all constitute deceptive practices under [the NJCFA].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Simandle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
90 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDEThird Circuit· 2009-08-18· cited 5,935×
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentThird Circuit· 1993-06-30· cited 3,171×
- Abbas v. DixonSecond Circuit· 2007-02-28· cited 1,274×
- Frederico v. Home DepotThird Circuit· 2007-11-09· cited 1,218×
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals· 1995-02-14· cited 1,009×
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Third Circuit· 1993-09-10· cited 830×
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1960-05-09· cited 786×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2002-11-08· cited 720×
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. KnowlesSupreme Court· 2013-03-19· cited 509×
- In Re Rockefeller Center Properties, Inc.Third Circuit· 1999-07-19· cited 466×
- Gennari v. Weichert Co. RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-04-15· cited 463×
- Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-09-15· cited 404×
- Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2009-02-19· cited 346×
- Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1999-10-26· cited 346×
- Jewish Center of Sussex Cty. v. WhaleSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-23· cited 282×
- DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services v. RochmanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2013-04-26· cited 282×
- Gaidon v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals· 1999-12-20· cited 260×
- Koch v. ACKER, MERRALL & CONDIT COMPANYNew York Court of Appeals· 2012-03-27· cited 215×
Other cases named Argabright v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.