Bigio v. Coca-Cola Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]leadings that[ ] .,. are no more than conclusions[ ] are not entitled to the assumption of truth.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• reciting that “an agency relationship results from a manifestation of consent by one person to another that the other shall act on his behalf and subject to his control, and the consent by the other to act” under New York law
• interpreting New York law to “require that the defendant’s conduct bear some contributory relation to the primary tort”
• “In cases where jurisdiction is based on the diversity of the parties’ citizenship, a federal court will apply the choice-of-law rules of the forum state[.]’’
• “In cases where jurisdiction is based on the diversity of the parties’ citizenship, a federal court will apply the choice-of-law rules of the forum state[.]”’
• “In cases where jurisdiction is based on the diversity of the parties’ citizenship, a federal court will apply the choice-of-law rules of the forum state[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).