Beyer v. Beyer

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 1278

Syllabus

Affirmed in part. The domestic relations court did not err in finding that the marital home was Husband's separate property despite evidence that the mortgage, expenses, and upkeep of the property were paid from commingled funds the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the domestic relations court abused its discretion in calculating child support based on the husband's income averaged over three years the domestic relations court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Wife violated the domestic relations court's mutual restraining order by not paying a utility bill for the marital home during the pendency of the divorce proceedings domestic relations court erred in not calculating a 10 percent downward deviation in Husband's child support obligation domestic relations court abused its discretion in ordering Husband to pay Wife cash medical support because the parties agreed in the shared parenting plan to split the children's medical expenses equally domestic relations court did not abuse its discretion in determining the effective date of Husband's child support obligation.