Betts v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a jury could have properly found that a design defect was unreasonably dangerous where it led to the placement of a fuel tank in a part of the car where it later caused a fire when punctured in an accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).