Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to enforce a policy provision currently allowed by K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 40-284[e][4]
• a trial judge has the discretion to exclude relevant evidence if he finds its probative value is substantially outweighed by its prejudicial nature
• which set out the rationale for allowing the insured to stack two automobile policies
• which set out the rationale for allowing the insured to stack two automobile policies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).