Berthiaume v. Caron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying certification because of, among other things, fundamental conflict between those that suffered net benefit and those that suffered net harm, citing Valley Dmg
• rejecting plaintiffs’ contention that “analysis of class certification in a monopolization case like this case is no different than a price-fixing conspiracy case”
• finding plaintiffs failed to meet the typicality requirement due to the broad differences between class members where each “had significantly different purchasing volumes, preferred different sensor products, and operated under materially different contract terms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).