Skip to main content
· 12/23/2009

Bernhardt v. Tradition North America

Citations

  • 676 F. Supp. 2d 301
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119982
  • 2009 WL 5033962

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a motion for sanctions under Rule 11 raises two issues: (1) whether Rule 11 has been violated, and (2) whether the court should exercise its discretion to award sanctions based on the violation
  • “Where a term of employment is for an indefinite period of time, it is presumed to be an employment at will that is freely terminable by either party at any time for any reason or even for no reason.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sidney H. Stein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.