Allen v. WestPoint-Pepperell, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[P]laintiffs were not harmed by use of the 9.3% discount rate because the rate satisfied the original intent of the parties--to provide EPI participants with the actual present value of their benefits upon a change of control.\
• “[Pjlaintiffs were not harmed by use of the 9.3% discount rate because the rate satisfied the original intent of the parties — to provide EPI participants with the actual present value of their benefits upon a change of control.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).