Allen v. Westpoint-Pepperell, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that consideration on a motion to dismiss is limited to facts on face of the complaint
• citing, inter alia, Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminum Ltd. Sales, Inc., 4 N.Y.2d 403, 406-07, 176 N.Y.S.2d 259, 151 N.E.2d 833, 835 (1958)
• the court may dismiss a claim on motion to dismiss only where it “appears beyond doubt” that the plaintiff can prove no facts that would entitle him to relief
• “An action for recision must be initiated without unreasonable delay”
• applying Rule 9(b) to rescission claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Allen v. Westpoint-Pepperell, Inc.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Allen v. WestPoint-Pepperell, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1996-05-13· cited 10×
• Allen v. Westpoint-Pepperell, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1997-02-11· cited 9×
• Allen v. WestPoint-Pepperell, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1997-01-28· cited 7×