Skip to main content

State v. Terry

Citations

  • 336 So. 2d 65

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant committed a robbery, the state must necessarily also prove larceny, because every robbery necessarily includes a larceny
  • explaining that elements are subsumed when “the burden of proof of the major crime cannot be discharged[] without proving the lesser crime as an essential link in the chain of evidence”
  • applying rule to permissive, as well as necessarily, lesser included offense
  • “Therefore, if the trial judge . . . found sufficient evidence to instruct the jury on the major offense of assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree, he should have instructed the jury on the necessarily included lesser offense of bare assault.”
  • “Therefore, if the trial judge . . . found sufficient evidence to instruct the jury on the major offense of assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree, he should have instructed the jury on the necessarily included lesser offense of bare assault.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Siegendorf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.