Bernard Koteen v. Bermuda Cablevision, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that company “purposefully established significant contacts with the District” by retaining a DC-based law firm, visiting the firm’s DC office, and communicating extensively with the firm by telephone and mail
• finding exercise of personal jurisdiction proper and noting that such exercise was fair as the defendant was not severely burdened by having to litigate in D.C.
• “[T]he [defendant’s] contacts with the District of Columbia must relate to the factual circumstances giving rise to the suit in order to support ‘specific jurisdiction’!.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).