Skip to main content
· 11/29/2007

Olson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 174 P.3d 849
  • 2007 Colo. App. LEXIS 2302
  • 2007 WL 4198354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court has the discretion to deny a request to file a surreply
  • holding that “[m]ere conclusory statements are not sufficient to raise genuine factual issues” in opposition to a motion for summary judgment
  • “As a general matter, ignorance of the law does not expand the statute of limitations for filing suit.”
  • “Mere conclusory statements are not sufficient to raise genuine factual issues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bernard, Vogt, Webb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.