District of Columbia· 11/24/2014
Bennett v. Donovan
Citations
- 74 F. Supp. 3d 382
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reducing fee award by ten percent where “several dozen” entries “lack[ed] adequate subject-matter descriptions, and a handful more [were] lumped together with activities that might not warrant reimbursement”
- reducing fee award by 10 percent where “several dozen [entries] lack[ed] adequate subject-matter descriptions, and a handful more [we]re lumped together with activities that might not warrant reimbursement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Ellen S. Huvelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tridico v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2017-01-30· cited 20×
- Center for Food Safety v. BurwellDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-04· cited 12×
- Dl v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2017-08-25· cited 12×
- Shaw v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-28· cited 12×
- Bloomgarden v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2017-05-25· cited 11×
- Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v. Telewizja Polska, S.A.District of Columbia· 2017-09-30· cited 2×
- S. v. District of Columbia Public SchoolsDistrict of Columbia· 2016-08-30
- Pursuing America's Greatness v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict of Columbia· 2020-06-01
- True the Vote, Inc. v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict of Columbia· 2020-09-23
- Infusino v. DevosDistrict of Columbia· 2022-11-04
- Crockwell v. AustinDistrict of Columbia· 2024-12-09
Cites
51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court· 1984-03-21· cited 7,642×
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 6,197×
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 3,144×
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,075×
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 1,875×
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,685×
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court· 1989-06-19· cited 1,583×
- Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court· 2002-03-27· cited 1,238×
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1994-12-12· cited 1,044×
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court· 1986-07-07· cited 991×
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborD.C. Circuit· 1980-09-02· cited 989×
- Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 719×
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1984-09-28· cited 522×
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District of Columbia· 1983-08-04· cited 409×
- National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseD.C. Circuit· 1982-04-23· cited 402×
- Demarest v. ManspeakerSupreme Court· 1991-01-08· cited 354×
- Covington v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1995-06-23· cited 317×
- Richlin Security Service Co. v. ChertoffSupreme Court· 2008-06-02· cited 271×
- In Re Theodore B. OLSOND.C. Circuit· 1989-09-08· cited 186×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.