Labor Ready Se v. Australian Warehouses

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under the circumstances of the case the appellant was not prejudiced by violation of rule 1.440
• explaining that where the case had been pending for more than four years, there was “no ambush or violation of the procedural safeguards that [Florida] Rule [of Civil Procedure] 1.440 was designed to protect”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).